sampen

Sample Entropy

Definition

Sample entropy. Formally: log(A / B) (template matches).

What does normal look like?

Fitted normative prior: Normal(μ = 2.036, σ = 0.4879), KS p = 7.8e-42, n = 61390.

Empirical distribution over the pooled nsrdb+nsr2db normative windows (360-beat windows, 120-beat stride), overlaid with the fitted Normal prior density. Vertical lines mark the median and the 5–95% range.

Normal-range summary (pooled nsrdb+nsr2db)

n varies by feature only through per-window validity over the full pooled nsrdb+nsr2db table (n up to 61 715; e.g. sampen/mse drop windows where the statistic is undefined). ulf is the one exception: a 360-beat (~5 min) window contains no ULF-band power, so it uses a long-window NSRDB-only extraction (see its own page).

Use cases

• Bias-corrected regularity measure (Richman & Moorman 2000).
• Distinguishing CHF / AF from healthy dynamics.
• Preferred over ApEn for short records.

Applications by area

Evidence is reported at the measure-family level; a specific variant may not be the exact index measured in every cited study.

Clinical

Coverage: statistics. A pooled literature; reviews or meta-analyses exist.

Commonly used for autonomic-complexity/regularity assessment (diabetic neuropathy, CHF, depression, aging mortality); the dominant "loss of complexity with disease" narrative is not universal: several well-cited studies report the opposite (higher/more erratic entropy in CHF, higher blood-pressure SampEn predicting higher mortality in a large aging cohort), and a 2026 scoping review of 55 studies explicitly withholds a pooled effect size due to methodological heterogeneity.

Dominant reported direction: mixed: mostly down (loss of complexity) in disease, reversed in some CHF/BP-signal studies.

Key references: (Yang et al., 2026); (Richman and Moorman, 2000).

Sports & peak performance

Coverage: individual papers. A small, scattered literature with no pooled meta-analysis.

Used only sporadically: a 19-study systematic review of HRV and overtraining in soccer found zero studies used any nonlinear/entropy index. Where used, reduced entropy/increased regularity tracks fatigue and intense training load, and higher resting entropy loosely tracks fitness, but samples are small (n = 11–34) and often only descriptive.

Dominant reported direction: down with fatigue/training load (sparse literature).

Key references: (Yang et al., 2026).

Contemplative practice

Coverage: individual papers. A small, scattered literature with no pooled meta-analysis.

Most studies report increased entropy/complexity with meditation practice (a "healthy variability" framing), but effect sizes are frequently small and non-significant in small pilots, and at least one apparent SampEn increase disappeared after covariate adjustment; no dedicated meta-analysis of entropy in meditation exists.

Dominant reported direction: up (fragile: often non-significant or vanishes on adjustment).

Key references: (Yang et al., 2026).

See the effect-distribution meta-analysis page for the harvested per-study effect sizes/p-values behind these domain summaries (docs/zoo_gen/effect_stats.csv).

Resources

Resource-intensity rank ◍◍◍◍◌ high is measured: median wall-clock time and allocations over a 360-beat window on synthetic realistic RR (docs/zoo_gen/bench_resources.jl; full grid in resource_bench.csv).

Cold = fresh memoization caches (builds every shared representation from scratch); warm = shared representations (diff, periodogram, Poincaré coords, DFA fluctuation) already cached, so only this feature is recomputed. The tier is derived from the cold cost; see Nonlinear subgraph (template matching / embedding — O(N²) worst case).

Citation

Sample entropy, Richman & Moorman (2000), correcting ApEn's self-match bias.

Seminal reference(s): (Richman and Moorman, 2000).

See the References page for the full bibliography.