vlf

Very Low Frequency Power (0.003-0.04 Hz)

Aliasesvery_low_frequency
Domainfrequency
Distribution familyGamma
Equationintegral(PSD; 0.003; 0.04) Hz
Resource intensity◍◍◍◌◌ moderate, Frequency subgraph (requires a Welch/Lomb–Scargle periodogram first). Warm (shared representation cached) is 14× cheaper. (measured, see §Resources)

Definition

Very low frequency power (0.003-0.04 Hz). Formally: integral(PSD; 0.003; 0.04) Hz.

What does normal look like?

Fitted normative prior: Gamma(α = 1.268, θ = 1016), KS p < 1e-300, n = 58892.

VLF (0.003–0.04 Hz) is degenerate on 360-beat windows. A 360-beat window (about 5 to 6 min) barely reaches the band's own lower edge, so Welch's frequency resolution cannot resolve power inside it for most windows, and the empirical median and IQR collapse to 0 below. Treat the plot and normal-range table as indicative only; a real VLF estimate needs much longer windows, ideally tens of minutes to hours, or a full-length recording.

Normative distribution of vlf

Empirical distribution over the pooled nsrdb+nsr2db normative windows (360-beat windows, 120-beat stride), overlaid with the fitted Gamma prior density. Vertical lines mark the median and the 5–95% range.

Normal-range summary (pooled nsrdb+nsr2db)

statisticvalue
median0
IQR (25–75%)0 – 0
5–95% range0 – 0
mean ± sd21.73 ± 235.3
n windows58892

n varies by feature only through per-window validity over the full pooled nsrdb+nsr2db table (n up to 61 715; e.g. sampen/mse drop windows where the statistic is undefined). ulf is the one exception: a 360-beat (~5 min) window contains no ULF-band power, so it uses a long-window NSRDB-only extraction (see its own page).

Use cases

  • Slow (0.003–0.04 Hz) rhythms linked to thermoregulation, renin–angiotensin, and physical activity.
  • Longer recordings (≥5 min, ideally hours) where the band resolves.
  • Prognostic marker in cardiac risk studies.

Applications by area

Evidence is reported at the measure-family level; a specific variant may not be the exact index measured in every cited study.

Clinical

Coverage: statistics. A pooled literature; reviews or meta-analyses exist.

ULF/VLF power is extensively studied in mortality risk stratification: lower ULF/VLF consistently predicts higher all-cause/cardiac/arrhythmic mortality post-MI, in CHF, ACS and elderly cohorts. A 2024 meta-analysis, however, found time-domain measures (SDNN, HTI) the strongest post-MI predictors rather than VLF/ULF specifically, and the band's own physiological interpretation (thermoregulation vs. renin–angiotensin vs. artifact) remains unsettled.

Dominant reported direction: down: lower ULF/VLF → higher mortality (contested against time-domain predictors).

Key references: (Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017); (Rueda-Ochoa et al., 2024); (Yuda et al., 2021).

Sports & peak performance

Coverage: individual papers. A small, scattered literature with no pooled meta-analysis.

Uncommon as a headline sports metric. Acute dose-response is consistent and strong (ULF/VLF falls monotonically with rising exercise intensity; ambulatory ULF rises sharply with movement, largely a motion-artifact/thermoregulatory effect), but chronic-training/overtraining findings are weak, inconsistent, and even sex-reversed within a single small study.

Dominant reported direction: down acutely with intensity; chronic/training direction unsettled.

Key references: (Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017).

Contemplative practice

Coverage: individual papers. A small, scattered literature with no pooled meta-analysis.

A minor, seldom-isolated component of meditation HRV research: one classic study reports dramatic, exaggerated VLF-spanning oscillations tied to extremely slow breathing during Chi/Kundalini meditation, while a more careful spectral study found no change in normalized VLF power but a significant drop in the residual (non-harmonic) component: illustrating strong method-dependence (raw vs. normalized vs. residual power).

Dominant reported direction: method-dependent (raw vs. normalized vs. residual).

Key references: (Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017).

See the effect-distribution meta-analysis page for the harvested per-study effect sizes/p-values behind these domain summaries (docs/zoo_gen/effect_stats.csv).

Resources

Resource-intensity rank ◍◍◍◌◌ moderate is measured: median wall-clock time and allocations over a 360-beat window on synthetic realistic RR (docs/zoo_gen/bench_resources.jl; full grid in resource_bench.csv).

metric (360-beat window)value
cold median wall-time0.05374 ms
warm median wall-time0.003827 ms
allocations (cold)29.8 KiB

Cold = fresh memoization caches (builds every shared representation from scratch); warm = shared representations (diff, periodogram, Poincaré coords, DFA fluctuation) already cached, so only this feature is recomputed. The tier is derived from the cold cost; see Frequency subgraph (requires a Welch/Lomb–Scargle periodogram first). Warm (shared representation cached) is 14× cheaper.

Citation

Akselrod et al. (1981) seminal HRV power-spectrum paper; band per Task Force (1996); Scargle (1982) unevenly-sampled spectral estimator.

Seminal reference(s): (Akselrod et al., 1981); (Task Force, European Society of Cardiology / North American Society of Pacing & Electrophysiology, 1996); (Scargle, 1982).

See the References page for the full bibliography.